Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rojas Talent Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:36, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rojas Talent Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find enough in-depth sourcing to pass WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I previously PRODed this, a collection of interviews, routine announcements, and blogs fails WP:NCORP. VickKiang (talk) 23:59, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Companies. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Clearly did not satisfy the notability requirement for companies. References provided in the article are routine coverage that did not establish any notability. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Per above, does not pass WP:GNG. Alex-h (talk) 16:13, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Promotional article falling well short of WP:GNG Dexxtrall (talk) 09:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:CORPDEPTH --Devokewater 15:36, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.